Last week I was bemoan-ing the lack of new polls in the
states. That isn't the case this week. There have been 40 polls conducted in 20
different states, including in 8 of the 11 battleground states I identified
last week. Of those battleground states I identified last week, the only three
that we don’t have polling data on as of this week are IA, NV & WI. So with
that new data, here's where we stand halfway through September:
Safe
|
Likely
|
Lean
|
Total
|
|
Obama
|
158
|
83
|
85
|
326
|
Romney
|
144
|
47
|
15
|
206
|
Tossup
|
6
|
If you want to see a visual breakdown of where states
fall, see the photo above or click here
for a map. Obviously, the darker the shade of blue or red, then the safer that
state is for that candidate. If you want to see how I arrived at these
categories, I would encourage you to review the first “State of the Race” post
I did on August 11 which can be found here.
Recently, the national polling has indicated a slight
break towards President Obama and this is showing in the state-by-state polls
as well. The most significant move in the past week was Florida moving from
“Tossup” to “Lean Obama.” Additionally, Michigan and New Hampshire moved from
“Lean Obama” to “Likely Obama.” Finally, Montana has been moved from “Safe
Romney” to “Likely Romney.” This leaves Iowa as the only state still in the
Tossup category and it is actually predicted at exactly a 50/50 proposition,
although it should be noted that it is one of the states that has not had any
state-by-state polling done this month. At this point the map continues to
favor the President, but what does that mean going forward and how much
movement can we expect?
Well, September 17, 2008 was the first time I did this
analysis using the data from 270towin.com, so let's take a look at where things
stood in mid-September 2008 versus where they stand in mid-September 2012. I
reviewed the spreadsheet I had done on September 17, 2008 and here was the
breakdown using the same categories and criteria that I've been using for my
2012 analysis.
Safe
|
Likely
|
Lean
|
Total
|
|
Obama
|
126
|
70
|
59
|
255
|
McCain
|
106
|
110
|
31
|
247
|
Tossup
|
36
|
For a visual break-down, you can check out the photo to
the right that shows the map as it stood in mid-September 2008. (Note: the
total on the map reflects state electoral votes as they stand in 2012 where the
chart above reflects where they were in 2008 before the 2010 census.) As I
looked at the spreadsheet as it stood on that date, I find a few things
remarkable. First, as I looked at McCain's states where he had at least a 90%
likelihood of winning, those were all the states that he won. All the states
below that threshold went to Obama – meaning that the demarcation line for the
states was pretty well-established. In other words, states weren't leapfrogging
over one another to move to the other side. What does this mean for 2012? It
means that the likelihood that states are going to switch sides can be
predicted by the other states on the continuum. For example, since Pennsylvania
is my original home state, let's take a look at the likelihood it would switch
and go for Governor Romney. The chances that it would go for Romney are
directly related to all the states that are in Obama's column currently but are
less likely to stay there. So if Pennsylvania goes for Governor Romney, we can
also expect states like Florida, Michigan, Ohio and Virginia to go for Romney
as well.
There was another thing I found remarkable as well and
that is how spread out the states were across my spreadsheet. There were
several states that were in each category and there appeared to be more of a
likelihood of movement within the states. This was obviously seen over the next
month and a half leading up to the election. The spreadsheets I've been doing
for the 2012 election have never looked like that. There is certainly a cluster
of states that are closer to the center, but the states on the edge have been
numerous and have stayed fairly consistent. There's been a lot of talk in this
election about polarization of politics in America and I think this is a
reflection of that trend. This data also supports the commentators who believe
that the majority of people have already made up their minds about this
election and there isn't much that could happen that would change their minds
at this point. Whether this is true remains to be seen.
This brings me to my final point and my final reflection
on the 2008 data: there was quite a bit of movement in the 2008 election from
mid-September until Election Day. Obviously, the financial crisis that hit in
the second half September had a lot to do with that along with Senator McCain's
reaction. Plus as I posted before, I believe the debates played a large role as
well. All this means that a lot can happen between now and November 6th
and all those things could very well make the map change dramatically. This
includes the debates that will be coming up and it is also making me follow the
situation in the Middle East and how both President Obama and Governor Romney
react to that evolving situation. In other words, no matter how rigid the
electorate looks now, all of that could change in the blink of an eye – which
is why I will keep monitoring the trends as we proceed through the campaign
calendar.
No comments:
Post a Comment